KIR Genotyping for NK Cell Therapy: Why Donor Selection Starts With the Right Typing

For allogeneic NK cell therapy programs, donor selection is not a procurement decision. It is a manufacturing decision. The donors you collect from determine the functional activity profile of the NK cells you produce, and KIR genotype is one of the most predictive donor variables for that functional profile. Most leukopak suppliers do not perform KIR genotyping as a standard donor characterization step. OrganaBio does it on every donor.

This piece explains what KIR genotyping is, why it matters for NK cell therapy starting material selection, how KIR haplotype and KIR-ligand interactions predict NK cell functional capacity, and what a standard KIR-typed donor pool enables for NK programs that a standard untyped pool does not.

What KIR Receptors Are and Why They Matter

Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) are a family of cell surface receptors expressed primarily on natural killer cells and a subset of T cells. They regulate NK cell activation and inhibition by binding to HLA class I ligands on target cells. The balance between activating and inhibitory KIR signals is the primary mechanism through which NK cells decide whether to kill a target cell.

The KIR gene family is located on chromosome 19q13.4. It contains 15 genes and two pseudogenes. Not every individual expresses every KIR gene — the KIR gene cluster is highly polymorphic, and the specific genes present in any individual’s KIR locus determine which receptors their NK cells express and how their NK cells respond to HLA class I ligands on potential target cells.

This is why KIR genotyping matters for NK cell therapy. An NK cell line derived from a donor whose KIR gene complement includes potent activating receptors that recognize tumor HLA ligands will behave very differently from an NK cell line derived from a donor whose KIR complement is dominated by inhibitory receptors that suppress killing of the same target. The difference is in the donor’s genome, and it is deterministic, not stochastic.

KIR Haplotypes: Group A and Group B

KIR genes are organized into two major haplotype groups based on the activating-to-inhibitory receptor ratio they encode.

Group A haplotypes contain a fixed set of genes encoding predominantly inhibitory KIR receptors: KIR3DL3, KIR2DL3, KIR2DL1, KIR2DL4, KIR3DL1, KIR2DS4, and KIR3DL2. Group A haplotypes have a single activating receptor gene (KIR2DS4) along with inhibitory KIR2DL1 and KIR2DL3. NK cells from Group A donors tend to have higher inhibitory signaling capacity relative to activating capacity.

Group B haplotypes are more variable and can contain additional activating receptor genes, including KIR2DS1, KIR2DS2, KIR2DS3, KIR2DS5, and KIR3DS1. Donors with centromeric and telomeric B haplotype content have NK cells with higher activating receptor expression. Published research has associated Group B haplotype content, particularly the B/x genotype (at least one Group B haplotype), with improved NK cell responses in allogeneic transplantation and with better outcomes in KIR-ligand mismatch scenarios.

For allogeneic off-the-shelf NK cell therapy programs, donors with higher activating KIR content — more B-content haplotypes, more activating receptor gene copies — typically produce NK cell lines with stronger cytotoxic activity against KIR-ligand-mismatched tumor targets. Selecting donors with specific KIR haplotype content is the mechanism through which programs can enrich their starting material pool for donors most likely to yield high-activity NK cell lines.

KIR-Ligand Interactions: What the Pairing Means for Target Killing

KIR function is not determined by KIR genotype alone. It is determined by the pairing between the donor’s KIR genes and the HLA class I ligands expressed on target cells. The key receptor-ligand pairs in the NK cell therapy context:

  • KIR3DL1 and HLA-Bw4. KIR3DL1 is an inhibitory receptor expressed on a large fraction of NK cells in most donors. It binds to HLA-Bw4 alleles. In a KIR-ligand mismatch scenario, tumor cells lacking HLA-Bw4 (or expressing HLA-Bw6 instead) lose inhibitory signaling to KIR3DL1-expressing NK cells, releasing those NK cells from inhibition and enabling killing. Donors who express KIR3DL1 are informative in this system; donors whose tumors lack HLA-Bw4 can be targeted by these NK cells.
  • KIR2DL1 and HLA-C group 2 (HLA-C2). KIR2DL1 is an inhibitory receptor that binds HLA-C alleles carrying the C2 epitope (Asn77, Lys80). Donor NK cells expressing KIR2DL1 are inhibited by HLA-C2+ targets. In C2-negative targets, this inhibitory signal is absent.
  • KIR2DL2/2DL3 and HLA-C group 1 (HLA-C1). The inhibitory receptors KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 bind HLA-C1 alleles (Ser80). Donors expressing KIR2DL2 or KIR2DL3 are inhibited by HLA-C1+ targets.
  • KIR2DS1 and HLA-C2. KIR2DS1 is an activating receptor that binds HLA-C2 alleles. This is the mirror of KIR2DL1. NK cells from donors expressing KIR2DS1 can be activated (not inhibited) by HLA-C2+ targets — a situation relevant to programs targeting tumor cells that express HLA-C2.

The practical consequence: for a specific tumor target, the optimal donor has the activating receptors that recognize the target’s HLA profile and lacks (or under-expresses) the inhibitory receptors that would suppress killing of that target. Identifying that donor from a pool of uncharacterized leukopak donors requires either KIR genotyping at time of selection or retrospective genotyping of collected material after the fact. The latter is less efficient and more expensive. The former requires a supplier who has already done the genotyping.

Why Standard Donor Characterization Panels Miss This

Standard leukopak donor characterization covers the information required for general research and manufacturing use: viability, cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, major cell fraction composition, HLA class I typing, donor health screening. This panel serves the majority of cell therapy starting material use cases well.

For NK cell therapy programs, the standard panel is incomplete. HLA typing tells you the donor’s HLA ligand profile. It does not tell you which KIR receptors the donor’s NK cells express or what their activating-to-inhibitory ratio looks like. Without KIR genotyping, a program selecting NK cell therapy starting material from a leukopak catalog is selecting from an uncharacterized KIR universe, without the information needed to identify donors whose NK cells will perform best against their target indication.

This is not a hypothetical limitation. NK cell therapy programs have discovered after manufacturing that starting material from certain donors produced consistently stronger cytotoxic NK lines than material from other donors, and retrospective KIR genotyping traced much of that variability back to KIR haplotype content. The programs that prospectively type and select for KIR genotype compress the discovery phase, improve manufacturing success rates per lot, and produce more consistent NK cell products across lots produced from different donors.

OrganaBio’s Standard KIR Typing Across All Donors

OrganaBio performs KIR genotyping on every donor in the leukopak program. This is not an add-on characterization service. It is standard. When an NK cell therapy program requests leukopak material from OrganaBio’s donor pool, the KIR genotype data is part of the standard donor record, available at time of selection.

The practical implications for NK cell therapy programs:

  • Prospective donor selection by KIR content. Programs can specify KIR haplotype requirements — B-content donors, specific activating receptor presence (KIR2DS1, KIR3DS1), specific inhibitory receptor combinations — and select donors who meet those criteria from the existing characterized pool. This replaces the process of collecting from untyped donors and retrospectively genotyping to find the right profile.
  • Manufacturing lot consistency. When every donor is typed, programs can restrict their starting material to donors with similar KIR profiles, producing more consistent NK cell products across manufacturing lots. This is a CMC consistency argument, not just a research argument.
  • Correlation between donor KIR profile and NK line performance. As a program collects data on the manufacturing performance and functional activity of NK lines derived from different donors, OrganaBio’s KIR database provides the donor-side variable that can be correlated with those outcomes. This builds toward a predictive model for donor selection that improves as the dataset grows.

What to Request When Specifying NK Cell Therapy Starting Material

For NK cell therapy programs working with OrganaBio, the KIR specification in a starting material request should include:

KIR haplotype group. Group B-content donors (B/A or B/B genotype) for programs prioritizing activating receptor enrichment. Group A/A donors may be specified for programs specifically studying inhibitory KIR function or where inhibitory receptor expression is the research variable.

Specific activating receptor presence. KIR2DS1 presence for programs targeting HLA-C2+ tumors. KIR3DS1 presence for programs with HLA-Bw4 mismatch targeting. KIR2DS2 presence for programs with HLA-C1-targeted killing designs.

Inhibitory receptor profile. Whether KIR2DL1 homozygous donors need to be excluded (for programs where strong HLA-C2 inhibitory signaling would suppress activity against the target). KIR3DL1 expression level for programs where Bw4 inhibitory signaling is a relevant variable.

HLA typing correlated with KIR. The donor’s own HLA-C and HLA-B alleles matter for autologous KIR education and licensing. Programs should specify whether they need KIR-licensed or unlicensed NK cells based on the HLA-KIR pairing.

The KIR Education and Licensing Question

KIR education refers to the process through which NK cells become licensed to kill. An NK cell that expresses an inhibitory KIR for which it has no self-HLA ligand is hyporesponsive. NK cells are licensed to kill when their inhibitory KIR recognizes and binds self-HLA, receiving education that allows them to respond vigorously to cells lacking that self-HLA.

For allogeneic off-the-shelf NK programs, donor NK cells need to be licensed by their own HLA. This means the donor’s KIR-HLA pairing is relevant, not just the KIR genotype in isolation. A donor expressing KIR3DL1 who also carries HLA-Bw4 will have licensed KIR3DL1+ NK cells. A donor expressing KIR3DL1 without HLA-Bw4 will have unlicensed KIR3DL1+ NK cells with reduced reactivity.

OrganaBio’s paired KIR genotype and HLA typing data enables programs to identify donors with the specific KIR-HLA combinations that produce licensed, functional NK cells for their target biology. This paired data is not available from untyped donor pools regardless of their size.

Comparing Supplier KIR Typing Practices

OrganaBio is currently the only starting material supplier that markets standard KIR genotyping across its entire leukopak donor program. Other suppliers in the market either do not perform KIR genotyping as standard practice, offer it as a custom or add-on service that must be requested and adds lead time, or do not address it in their donor characterization documentation.

For programs in the evaluation phase comparing suppliers, the KIR question surfaces this distinction cleanly. Ask any supplier: is KIR genotyping standard on every donor in your leukopak program, or is it available as custom characterization? If the answer is custom, the practical implication is that the data will not be available at time of initial selection, and generating it adds lead time and often cost to the donor qualification process.

Applications Beyond Off-the-Shelf NK

While allogeneic off-the-shelf NK programs represent the highest-demand KIR context, KIR typing is relevant to several other research and manufacturing applications:

  • KIR-HLA mismatch immunotherapy research. Programs studying the role of KIR-ligand mismatch in tumor immune evasion or in transplant tolerance require donors with defined KIR genotypes to build controlled experimental comparisons.
  • NK cell expansion research. Protocols optimizing NK cell expansion conditions often need to control for donor KIR profile to separate the effect of the protocol from the effect of donor genetics on expansion efficiency.
  • Mechanism of action studies for NK-engaging therapies. Programs developing bispecific NK cell engagers or antibodies that recruit NK cells (ADCC) benefit from knowing the KIR profile of the NK cell donors used in preclinical functional assays.
  • Peripheral blood NK cell subtype characterization. Research programs characterizing CD56bright vs. CD56dim NK cells and their KIR expression patterns need donors with known KIR genotypes to correlate phenotype with genetics.

Working With OrganaBio for KIR-Typed NK Cell Therapy Starting Material

OrganaBio’s NK cell therapy starting material program combines standard KIR genotyping across all donors with GMP-capable leukapheresis processing and CTDMO services through the Excellos integration. Programs that need KIR-selected starting material for allogeneic NK programs, KIR-typed research material for mechanism studies, or a CTDMO partner who can process KIR-typed material through GMP manufacturing can access all three through OrganaBio’s program.

To discuss KIR-specific donor availability for your NK cell therapy or NK research program, contact OrganaBio. Provide your target indication, your KIR specification requirements, and your manufacturing timeline, and we will identify donors in the current pool that match your program specifications.

Source from OrganaBio

FDA-registered. ISO 7 cGMP. Ships anywhere in the US.

View LeukoPAK-NK-PBTalk to Our Team

Frequently Asked Questions

What is KIR genotyping and why does it matter for allogeneic NK cell therapy?

KIR (Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor) genotyping characterizes the inhibitory and activating receptor complement on a donor’s NK cells. In allogeneic NK therapy, KIR-ligand mismatch between donor NK cells and target tumor cells is associated with higher killing activity — the donor’s inhibitory KIRs fail to engage the target’s HLA, releasing the NK cell from inhibition. Without KIR genotyping, you cannot predict whether a given donor’s NK cells will be active against your specific tumor target. Selecting donors based solely on CD56/CD16 phenotype without KIR data is making a cell therapy product with an unknown functional ceiling.

What is the difference between KIR haplotype A and haplotype B, and which is preferred for NK therapy?

KIR haplotype A contains primarily inhibitory KIR genes with a single activating receptor (KIR2DS4), while haplotype B contains multiple activating KIR genes including KIR2DS1, KIR2DS2, and KIR3DS1. Haplotype B donors — particularly B/x (one B haplotype) and B/B (two B haplotypes) genotypes — produce NK cells with more activating receptor content. For allogeneic NK cell therapy programs targeting hematologic malignancies, B-content donors are generally preferred because activating KIRs contribute to tumor recognition independent of HLA mismatch. B/B donors have the highest activating KIR content. OrganaBio performs KIR genotyping on qualified NK donors and documents haplotype in the COA.

What KIR data appears on an OrganaBio NK cell COA?

OrganaBio’s NK COAs for KIR-typed donors document: KIR gene presence/absence for the major inhibitory KIRs (KIR2DL1, KIR2DL2/3, KIR3DL1) and activating KIRs (KIR2DS1, KIR2DS2, KIR2DS4, KIR3DS1), haplotype classification (A/A, A/B, B/B), and the corresponding HLA-C and HLA-B ligand data. This allows you to predict KIR-ligand match or mismatch against a specific patient or tumor target HLA profile. 6-digit NGS HLA typing is performed on all qualified donors, which gives you the resolution needed to model KIR-ligand interactions precisely.

How do I request a KIR-typed NK donor from OrganaBio?

Specify your KIR requirements when requesting a quote or speaking with the OrganaBio team. You can filter by haplotype (B-content preferred for most NK therapy programs), specific activating KIR gene presence, HLA-C group ligand status (C1/C2 ligands for KIR2DL1 and KIR2DL2/3), or KIR-ligand mismatch relative to a specific patient or target HLA profile. OrganaBio maintains a qualified donor pool with KIR genotyping data on file, enabling same-donor repeat collections if your program requires longitudinal NK cell supply from a single characterized donor.

Can I use the same KIR-typed donor for both process development and clinical NK cell manufacturing?

Yes, if the donor passes both RUO and GMP qualification criteria. OrganaBio maintains a unified donor pool where the same donor who supplied RUO material for process development can be recalled for GMP-grade collection when the program transitions to manufacturing. This matters for KIR-typed donors specifically because donor selection is based on a specific KIR profile — if your process was optimized using a B/B donor’s NK cells, being forced to switch to a different donor at the GMP stage introduces a comparability problem. Unified pool access avoids that gap.

Andrew Larson

Managing Director, CPC Services

Andrew joins OrganaBio as a project manager with varied experience in project management, client relations, and process improvement.

Prior to OrganaBio, Andrew was a client relations manager for the cGMP nucleic acids business unit at Aldevron, coordinating and managing contracts at each stage of the contract lifecycle in support of cell and gene therapy program development. Andrew supported small- and large-scale biotechnology and pharmaceutical clients anywhere from pre-IND work through commercial supply chain establishment. Before Aldevron, Andrew was a project manager for the commercialization and business development department for Sanford Health, a worldwide hospital institution. At Sanford Health, Andrew helped manage medical device patent and prototype development efforts for employee innovations primarily in the cardiovascular, neurovascular, and software spaces. Andrew was also an engineer for Atirix Medical Systems and supported the buildout of automated analysis worksheets to streamline radiology department quality control procedures.

Andrew received his Bachelor of Science in Physics from Minnesota State University Moorhead and his Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. At the University of Minnesota, Andrew was part of the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, assisting efforts to automate MRI dataset registration and workflow improvement.

Michael Dee

Associate Director, QC and Analytical Development

Michael Dee has spent the last 17 years researching the immune system. Initially studying the recombinant cytokine IL-2 and its role in T cell subset differentiation and function at the University of Miami. He also helped elucidate the lower level of TCR diversity of T regs required to prevent autoimmunity in mice. Michael also supported construction, cloning, production, purification, and testing both in vitro and in vivo a novel IL-2/IL2Rα complex currently under clinical development with BMS. Michael also was a member of the department of immunology’s program project delineating the effect of a novel Eg7GP96 heat shock protein vaccine on tumor immunity.

While at Immunity Bio (formerly Altor Biosciences), he helped to characterize over 20 novel drugs for immune modulation and treatment of cancer.  After Immunity Bio, Michael was a founding team member of HCW Biologics, where he continued his role in design and initial production and characterization of several novel biologics. He has experience with proof of principle experiments with the generation CAR-NK and CAR T cells. His research at HCW was highlighted by his discovery of a process using novel biologics to activate and expand CIML NK cells. The process and rights were sold to Wugen and is currently in Phase I clinical trials. He also is listed as an Inventor on patent number: US20210268022A1 on method of activating regulatory T cells.

Meram Alamoudi

Senior Cell Processing Specialist

Meram received her master’s degree in biomedical sciences from Barry University and bachelor’s in Biology from Palm Beach Atlantic University.

Before her position at OrganaBio, Meram conducted research at Larkin University where she worked on assessing the impact of Hurricane Maria on respiratory diseases in Puerto Rico, which provided her with insight into research investigation and analysis along with generation of grant documentation.

Valeria Beckhoff-Ferrero

Senior Bioprocess Scientist

Valeria Beckhoff Ferrero has over 8 years of experience in the fields of stem cell research and tissue engineering. Valeria received her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering, specializing in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, from Drexel University in Philadelphia. Valeria has expertise in problem solving and finding manufacturing solutions for isolating various types stem cells and other cell derived products from different tissues.

Before joining OrganaBio, Valeria was a lead manufacturing engineer at the Amnion Foundation. She aided in instituting a GMP infrastructure, including documentation, to manufacture clinical grade placental derived stem cells. In her role, she worked in perfecting isolation, culture, selection and cell maintenance processes for perinatal derived stem cells.

Valeria’s experience includes working as an Automation Engineer at the New York Stem Cell Foundation, where she aided in the creation and coding procedures for liquid handlers to manufacture induced pluripotent stem cells. At NYSF, Valeria researched new methods of sorting, reprogramming and differentiating iPSCs.

During her studies, Valeria worked at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital’s Radiation Oncology department, where she engineered various devices to aid in hyperthermia treatments. Additionally, Valeria co-authored multiple publications on magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound and radiation antennas for hyperthermia treatments.

Marisa Reinoso

Director, Regional Scientific Sales

Marisa has experience leading marketing and sales life sciences programs for over a decade. Originally a lab researcher, she made the jump to marketing & sales in life sciences and never looked back.

At OrganaBio, she connects cell therapy developers on the West coast and in Asia with the healthy donor starting materials they need to develop their therapies. Prior to OrganaBio, she was the cell therapy marketing lead at Invetech, heading the launch of the company’s first cell therapy product. Marisa has led marketing programs at clinical supply companies Sherpa Clinical Packaging and PCI Pharma Services. In her spare time, Marisa enjoys traveling, eating, and pretending she’s a tennis player. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Reed College and an MBA from Portland State University.

Thelma Cela

Senior Director, Tissue Procurement

Thelma Cela is a top performing professional with over 25 years’ experience in management, leadership, business development and marketing fields with business acumen and skills in driving revenue and profit growth in multiple corporate cultures. Prior to joining OrganaBio, Thelma served as Senior Director for Health and Human Services for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Her role had oversight for health clinics, health plan administration, the behavioral health department, and elder services. In this governmental administrative capacity, Thelma had primarily responsibility for the HHS’ divisions’ budget, capital projects, utilization management, efficiency, and efficacy.

Thelma’s prior work experiences include Vice President of Clinical Operations for OrthoNOW. In this role, she provided guidance on all clinical matters, set direction on clinical policies and procedures and monitoring healthcare policy changes. As the national Vice President of Clinical Operations, Thelma also designed, developed, and implemented guidelines and protocols and ensured compliance regarding overall patient experience.

Before joining OrthoNOW, Thelma had been recruited by Leon Medical Centers, a private healthcare company operating comprehensive medical centers to launch a new business line addressing the health and wellness of an aging population. As Director, Thelma researched, created, and launched the company’s Health Living Centers which provided first of its kind facilities in the South Florida market to offer services to the community of health aging.

Thelma has a proven track record in multiple corporate healthcare cultures having worked for Mercy Hospital where she was Senior Program Director of their Diabetes Treatment Center and Director of their Surgical Weight Loss Program. She enhanced these service lines awareness in the community, improved both lines’ clinical outcomes, and built volume growth while maintaining ongoing physician support. She served in a similar capacity for American Healthways.

Thelma earned her MBA from Miami Regional University where she graduated Cum Laude and her undergraduate degree in Psychology is from the University of Miami.

She serves on the advisory panel for Florida International University’s Women in Business Leadership Program helping future women become future business leaders through thought leadership, barrier destruction, and the power of influence.

Dominic Mancini

Vice President, Operations

Dominic Mancini brings 12 years of experience working the interfaces between Analytical Development, Process Development, Quality, and Manufacturing Science to OrganaBio. A lifelong learner, Dominic enjoys solving the many scientific and operational challenges presented in the field of cell and gene therapy.

Prior to OrganaBio, Dominic spent 8 years at Bluebird Bio as the company grew from 45 to 1200+ employees and from 1 clinical asset to a robust commercial pipeline. At Bluebird, Dominic initially supported the development and technology transfer of lentiviral vector manufacturing processes. As demand grew for lentiviral process and product characterization, Dominic led the development, qualification, transfer, and validation two commercial release methods. Dominic transitioned back to the Process Development organization to lead the vector manufacturing core team, increasing operational efficiency through a 5S implementation, process schedule intensification, and reverse technology transfer initiative. More recently, Dominic supported the build-out of bluebird’s Manufacturing Science & Technology team followed by the Data Systems & Analytics team, handling late-stage commercial asset support.

Dominic received his Bachelor of Chemical Engineering with Distinction from the University of Delaware. Dominic’s undergraduate research culminated in his thesis on heterologous expression of G-protein coupled receptors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After graduation, Dominic was the premier hire of the Zhou Laboratory at Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, MA. In three years, Dominic established an animal model of COPD and co-authored several papers with his collaborators in the Pulmonary division.

Christopher B. Goodman

Vice President, Quality & Regulatory Affairs

Christopher B. Goodman is a biopharmaceutical consultant and executive making a global impact in the cellular therapy technology arena. The scope of Christopher’s expertise encompasses Cellular Therapeutic Operations, Quality and Regulatory Affairs, Global Corporate Operations, Scientific Strategic Planning, Scientific R&D Collaborations, and Marketing & Commercialization.

Christopher recently joined OrganaBio as their Vice President of Regulatory Affairs. In this role, Christopher will be helping the company, its clients and partners navigate the complexities of the domestic and international regulatory requirements governing advanced cellular therapy products and manufacturing.

Previously, Christopher held positions with the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB), Virgin Health Bank, Ventana Medical Systems, and Celgene.

While with AABB, he held the positions of Senior Director of New Products and Lead Quality Assessor, auditing both domestic and international organizations to known standards in an effort to promote and ensure patient quality care and manufactured product consistency and standardization within Cellular Therapy, Blood Banking, Transfusion Services, Perioperative and Donor Center industries and operations. He contributed greatly to the work of AABB’s accreditation program providing his deep breadth of knowledge and technical acumen on many committees during his tenure. His pioneering work in the realm of virtual assessments during the COVID pandemic allowed AABB to flex into the planning and execution of this novel approach to the maintenance of accreditation activities during a global travel crisis. His agile thinking and approach to planning provided as minimal disruption as possible to AABB’s customer facilities.

While working with Virgin Health Bank in the State of Qatar and the United Kingdom, Christopher advanced through a series of executive roles. He joined Virgin Health Bank as the Director of Operations, during which time he managed the successful design, and build out of a new state-of-the-art cGMP facility, the first in the Middle East. As Director and Chief Executive Officer, he directed the launch of the first Arab-centric stem cell bank, and strategically guided the organization to enhanced shareholder value and expansion across the Middle East and UK. In these roles, he also oversaw global corporate operations, research collaborations, product portfolio expansion, and regulatory framework.

Christopher managed the Detection and Chemistry Assay Development Group for Ventana Medical Systems, a global leader and innovator of tissue-based diagnostic solutions. In this role, he directed overall program goals, optimized resources, and guided technical and product direction in global regulated environments.

Prior to Ventana Medical Systems, he held the position of Director of Operations for the high-growth Cellular Therapeutics Division of Celgene. As a senior-level scientist and member of the executive team, he directed divisional operations, medical affairs and executed business and scientific strategic planning.

Danielle Smyla

Senior Director, Quality Assurance

Danielle Smyla, M.S., brings 14 years of Quality Assurance and GMP experience in the Biotechnology and Medical Device industries. Ms. Smyla is an established Quality Leader with expertise in the implementation, management and continuous improvement of Quality Management Systems for GMP operations.

Prior to joining OrganaBio, Danielle was a key member of the Quality Management team at Canon BioMedical, where she led the cross-functional development and implementation of their Quality Management System. She also managed a team of Quality Specialists and Sr. Specialists, coaching them in the implementation, management and identification of improvements to quality processes.

Ms. Smyla’s Quality-focused career is complimented by valuable hands-on experience in GMP product manufacturing, as well as R&D laboratory experimentation and formulation work in support of product development.

Danielle has earned a Master’s in Biotechnology from the Johns Hopkins University and a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from the George Washington University.

Sarah Alter, Ph.D.

Lab Director

Sarah Alter, Ph.D., is Laboratory Director at OrganaBio, LLC, where she provides technical leadership across laboratory operations, process development, product manufacturing, and clinical sample processing services supporting cell and gene therapy developers worldwide. She brings more than 20 years of immunology and translational research experience spanning autoimmunity, oncology, and infectious disease.

Since joining OrganaBio in 2018, Dr. Alter has progressed through roles of increasing responsibility, first as Director of Immunology, leading development and manufacturing of human-derived immune cell products for immuno-oncology partners and clients; then as Senior Director of Scientific Affairs, where she served as immunology subject matter expert and shaped scientific strategy across new product launches, market analyses, and client engagements. She also served as founding Managing Director of HemaCenter, LLC, OrganaBio’s FDA-registered leukapheresis collection subsidiary, where she stood up operations, recruited the medical team, and authored governing protocols and SOPs.

Earlier in her career, Dr. Alter led preclinical R&D for IL-15–based immunotherapies at Altor BioScience (now ImmunityBio), contributing to programs that advanced into the clinic and co-authoring numerous peer-reviewed publications. She holds a Ph.D. in Immunology from the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and an M.Sc. in Microbiology from Florida Atlantic University, and is a registered Patent Agent licensed to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Carlos Carballosa, Ph.D

Vice President, Sales

Dr. Carlos Carballosa holds a doctorate in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Miami and currently leads global sales for OrganaBio as the VP of Sales. Since joining the company in 2018, Carlos has had a hand in managing all of OrganaBio’s products and services including perinatal tissue, apheresis material, and cell processing and cryopreservation support services for clinical trials.

Oscar Robles

Director, Quality Systems

Oscar Robles has over thirty years of experience in pharmaceutical and medical device industries. His main areas of expertise are in Quality Systems, Quality Assurance, Manufacturing Systems Validation, Computerized Systems Validation, implementation of GxP Computerized Systems and ERP Systems such as TrackWise, Electronic Document Management, JDEwards, SAP, and Oracle. Prior to joining OrganaBio, Oscar was a member of the Quality Management team at Apotex – Aveva Drug Delivery Systems for ten years. Oscar has earned a Master’s in Business Administration from Nova Southeastern University and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Florida International University.

Request Free Sample Free Sample
OrganaBio acquires Excellos
OrganaBio Acquires Excellos,
Expanding to San Diego

San Diego, California  ·  Downtown cGMP Facility

OrganaBio has acquired substantially all operating assets of Excellos Inc., creating a coast-to-coast CTDMO with cGMP capabilities across Miami and San Diego under one quality management system.

6ISO 5
Cleanrooms
2Coastal
Locations
Dismiss