AllCells, part of Discovery Life Sciences (DLS) since 2024, is one of the most established leukopak suppliers in cell therapy. Their donor network, deliverability metrics, and GMP infrastructure are mature and well-documented. This page compares AllCells / DLS against OrganaBio honestly — where DLS has scale advantages OrganaBio doesn’t, and where OrganaBio’s vertically integrated CTDMO model is structurally different.
The Honest Verdict
Choose AllCells if: you need the largest published apheresis network, 98% deliverability at scale, or DLS’s broader translational-research platform (biospecimens, sequencing, biomarker services).
Choose OrganaBio if: you want the same donor pool from research through GMP under one quality system, bi-coastal owned manufacturing, and characterization included standard.
The tradeoff: AllCells / DLS has scale and platform breadth. OrganaBio has vertical integration and less consolidation-driven disruption risk. Both operate to high donor-quality standards; the honest difference is model, not raw quality.
Head-to-head at a glance
| Attribute | AllCells | OrganaBio |
|---|---|---|
| Parent company | Discovery Life Sciences (DLS), acquired AllCells 2024 | Privately held, purpose-built CTDMO |
| Reported employee count | ~50 (AllCells unit), 511+ (DLS parent) | Purpose-built cell therapy operator, smaller footprint |
| Category | Leukopaks + biospecimens (DLS platform: sequencing, biomarkers, immuno-oncology) | CTDMO — cell sourcing, testing, development, manufacturing |
| Apheresis network | Published as “world’s largest” post-DLS acquisition | HemaCenter (FDA-registered) + Excellos San Diego + custom expansion |
| Published deliverability | 98% collection deliverability | Documented shipping deviations: 0 across CPC operations |
| Fresh leukopaks | Yes, multi-tier cell count formats | Fresh + cryopreserved, single-donor, ≥10B cells |
| GMP leukopaks | GMP program available | Single cGMP-aligned track, ISO 7 cleanrooms, bi-coastal |
| Standard leukopak spec | ≥90% viability, ≥26×10⁶ cells/mL, ≥280 mL | Comparable specs, plus <3% granulocyte contamination, ≥70% PBMC recovery |
| HLA typing | Available | Standard on every donor (A, B, C, DR, DQ, DP) |
| KIR / CD16 / CD32 genotyping | Not marketed as standard | Included standard, no additional fee |
| Disease-state biospecimens | Yes (broad DLS catalog) | 6 disease-state PBMC products live, 24 indications with donor access |
| CTDMO manufacturing | Not a CTDMO — sourcing + biospecimens | Full CTDMO — sourcing, testing, and cGMP manufacturing |
| Facility footprint | AllCells sites + broader DLS network | Bi-coastal — Miami + Irvine + Hayward + San Diego (Excellos) |
Where each supplier is genuinely strong
Where AllCells wins
- Scale of apheresis network. Post-DLS acquisition, AllCells claims the largest published apheresis collection network in the category. If you need geographic breadth or high-volume weekly delivery, they have the infrastructure.
- 98% deliverability metric. Publicly documented and widely cited. Comparable to industry-leading rates for large-volume collection programs.
- DLS platform integration. If your program needs biospecimens, sequencing services, biomarker analysis, and immuno-oncology capabilities alongside leukopaks from a single vendor, DLS’s platform depth is real.
- Established documentation. AllCells has a decade of published GMP documentation examples and IND-supporting materials in the field. Regulatory teams familiar with them can move fast.
Where OrganaBio wins
- Full CTDMO scope, not just sourcing. OrganaBio supplies starting material AND runs cGMP manufacturing. AllCells is a supplier — for downstream manufacturing you engage a separate CDMO. OrganaBio consolidates both under one QMS.
- Same donor pool, RUO to GMP. The same donor serves research and clinical use under one quality system. No requalification when programs advance to IND.
- Characterization included standard. HLA (A, B, C, DR, DQ, DP) + KIR + CD16 + CD32 genotyping on every donor at no additional cost. AllCells offers characterization but not as a standard bundle on every donor.
- Bi-coastal manufacturing under one CTDMO. Miami + San Diego (Excellos) ISO 7 cleanroom suites. Consolidation across a single QMS reduces documentation and site-transfer overhead.
- Less consolidation-driven disruption risk. DLS is a rollup — customer complaints across the sector often cite revolving door sales staff and integration friction during rollup transitions. OrganaBio’s ownership has been stable.
Where they’re comparable
- Both use the Spectra Optia® apheresis system for leukopak collection
- Both donor centers are FDA-registered, AABB-accredited, and CLIA-certified
- Both offer negative and positive selection immune cell purification
- Both support IND-enabling documentation and QA release
- Both offer disease-state biospecimen collections under IRB-approved protocols
Which one fits your program
Choose AllCells if you need…
- You need the largest apheresis network available today
- Your program benefits from DLS’s broader biospecimen / sequencing / biomarker platform
- Procurement has an existing AllCells / DLS master agreement
- You want a supplier explicitly positioned around collection deliverability at scale
Choose OrganaBio if you need…
- You want one CTDMO — cell sourcing, testing, development, and cGMP manufacturing — instead of separate supplier + CDMO
- Your program will advance from research to clinical with the same donor pool
- You need bi-coastal supply security (Miami + San Diego) under one QMS
- You want deep donor characterization (HLA + KIR + CD16 + CD32) included on every lot
Frequently asked
Is AllCells the same as Discovery Life Sciences?
AllCells is a business unit of Discovery Life Sciences following the 2024 acquisition. Products are still branded AllCells, but the company operates under the DLS umbrella. Some AllCells services now integrate with DLS’s broader biospecimen and analytical platform.
Is OrganaBio’s donor network comparable in scale?
OrganaBio’s HemaCenter is smaller than the DLS aggregate apheresis network, and OrganaBio is honest about that. What OrganaBio does differently is own the donor pool end-to-end from apheresis through cGMP manufacturing under one QMS. Different model, not necessarily fewer resources.
What does “CTDMO” mean and why does OrganaBio use that term instead of CDMO?
CTDMO stands for Cell Therapy Contract Testing, Development, and Manufacturing Organization. The “T” (Testing) is deliberate — OrganaBio’s model includes QC and assay development as part of the same organization, not as an external add-on. Traditional CDMOs supply manufacturing but externalize testing.
Which supplier has better documentation for IND filings?
Both AllCells / DLS and OrganaBio have IND-supporting documentation packages. AllCells has a longer public track record of INDs on file with FDA involving their material. OrganaBio’s documentation is built for their CTDMO model — same donor RUO through GMP with continuous chain of custody records. Which is easier depends on your regulatory strategy.
Where does OrganaBio outperform AllCells on donor characterization?
OrganaBio includes high-resolution HLA typing across 6 loci (A, B, C, DR, DQ, DP), plus KIR, CD16, and CD32 genotyping on every donor as part of the standard CoA. AllCells offers characterization but not as a standard bundle on every donor — additional work often requires per-lot or per-program requests.
Compare against your program spec.
Send us your protocol requirements. We’ll tell you honestly where OrganaBio is the better fit and where AllCells / DLS would serve you better.