GMP leukopak collection equipment in a cell therapy processing facility

GMP Cell Therapy Starting Material for CAR-T: Donor Selection, Apheresis Specs, and Supply Chain Requirements

GMP Cell Therapy Starting Material for CAR-T: Donor Selection, Apheresis Specs, and Supply Chain Requirements

Your CAR-T manufacturing run is only as good as what you put into it on Day 0. Before your vector touches a T cell, before your transduction protocol runs, before your expansion step begins, the quality of your leukopak determines the ceiling of your entire process. CD4:CD8 ratios that are off, memory subsets depleted by poor handling, T cells that arrive pre-activated and partially exhausted: these problems don’t get fixed downstream. They get amplified. Understanding what to require from your starting material supplier, and how to evaluate whether they can actually deliver it, is one of the highest-leverage decisions in your early-phase manufacturing program.

Why Starting Material Quality Determines CAR-T Manufacturing Outcome

CAR-T cell therapy begins with a leukapheresis product, and the cellular composition of that product shapes every downstream metric that matters: transduction efficiency, expansion potential, memory phenotype of the final product, and ultimately in vivo persistence.

Research published in PMC4277394 identified T cell subset composition as a key determinant of CAR-T product quality and clinical outcome. The CD4:CD8 ratio in the starting material influences the ratio in the final product, and studies have linked specific ratios to improved expansion and function. Memory T cell subsets, particularly stem cell memory (Tscm) and central memory (Tcm), are associated with better persistence and response durability compared to terminally differentiated effector cells (Temra). Starting material with a high proportion of late-stage effector T cells will yield a product with limited proliferative capacity, regardless of how well the manufacturing process runs.

Activation status at collection matters too. T cells that are pre-activated going into your manufacturing process, whether from systemic inflammation in the donor or from suboptimal processing, can accelerate exhaustion during expansion. You want naïve and memory subsets that haven’t yet committed to a terminal effector fate. The window between healthy leukopak collection and the first manufacturing step is where that phenotype is either preserved or lost, which is why processing speed from your supplier is a functional specification, not just a logistics preference.

Granulocyte contamination in the leukopak is another variable that directly affects PBMC yield. Leukopaks with greater than 3% granulocyte content or greater than 3% hematocrit can complicate your PBMC isolation step and reduce yield. These are real product specifications to require in your certificate of analysis.

Donor Qualification Requirements for GMP Leukopak Sourcing

Not every donor who walks into an apheresis center is appropriate for GMP cell therapy starting material. The qualification framework separates donors who can supply healthy, phenotypically appropriate T cells from those who cannot, and it has to be executed before collection, not discovered in the COA after the fact.

Infectious disease marker testing is the baseline. Donors must be screened for HIV-1/2, HCV, HBV, HTLV-I/II, syphilis, and West Nile Virus at minimum, following FDA-mandated infectious disease testing requirements for source plasma and cellular products used in manufacturing. This testing must be performed at a licensed laboratory using FDA-approved assays, and documentation must be included with the product.

Health screening beyond infectious disease covers general fitness for apheresis: adequate vein access, hemoglobin and hematocrit within normal ranges, platelet count, blood pressure, and absence of active illness or immunosuppressive medications. Donors on chronic NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or recent immunomodulatory therapies may have altered T cell subset distributions that make them inappropriate for your use case.

HLA typing is increasingly relevant for allogeneic programs and for programs building a matched donor registry. High-resolution HLA typing at six loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, -DPB1) gives your team the data to identify specific donors when a matched product is required. KIR genotyping adds another layer of characterization for NK-cell-adjacent programs. OrganaBio offers HLA typing and KIR genotyping as part of its donor characterization service, so this data ships with your product rather than requiring a separate order.

CMV serostatus matters for certain programs. CMV-seropositive donors carry CMV-specific T cells in their peripheral blood, which can be an advantage or a disadvantage depending on your program design. Your supplier should be able to identify CMV-negative donors from their pool on request.

For IND studies, donor recallability is not a nice-to-have. FDA may require traceability back to the original donor if a safety signal emerges. Your supplier needs a registry-based donor management system that can recall specific donors, not just a pool of anonymous apheresis appointments.

Apheresis Specifications: Leukopak Collection and Product Specs

A leukopak is an apheresis product enriched for white blood cells, typically collected over two to three hours using a continuous flow apheresis device. The collection process concentrates peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), including T cells, B cells, NK cells, and monocytes, along with some granulocytes and platelets. What you receive should meet specifications that you define in your quality agreement before the first collection.

Key specifications to require in your leukopak COA:

  • Total nucleated cell count (post-collection, pre-processing)
  • Viability at time of collection (trypan blue or automated counter)
  • Granulocyte content as a percentage of total cells (target: less than 3%)
  • Hematocrit (target: less than 3%)
  • Volume of the collection product
  • CD3+ T cell percentage and absolute count (if immunophenotyping is included)
  • Collection date, collection site, and processing timestamps

Volume and total cell count determine how much starting material you actually have for your manufacturing run. A leukopak that meets granulocyte and hematocrit specs but comes in low on total cell count can limit your downstream options, particularly for programs that require multiple product lots from a single donor.

Quarter-split leukopaks are available from some suppliers, including OrganaBio, for programs that need to distribute starting material across multiple sites or reserve aliquots for QC testing, stability studies, or future manufacturing runs. Each quarter-split is cryopreserved separately with its own COA and chain-of-custody documentation.

Processing speed from collection to first centrifuge spin is a meaningful variable. Delays between blood draw and initial processing allow T cell activation to begin, alter subset distributions, and reduce viability. OrganaBio averages 30 minutes from blood receipt at its facility to first centrifuge spin. This matters in context: many sponsors run their own client-specific processing windows, and getting within that window consistently is what protects your starting material phenotype.

GMP vs. RUO Starting Material: Regulatory Differences and Documentation Requirements

The distinction between GMP-grade and research use only (RUO) starting material is not just a label. It represents a fundamentally different documentation, testing, and quality system infrastructure, and regulators have clear expectations about which grade is appropriate for different stages of product development.

RUO material is appropriate for discovery work, assay development, biomarker research, and early preclinical studies. It is not appropriate for manufacturing a cell therapy product intended for human infusion, even at Phase 1. Using RUO-grade starting material in your IND manufacturing program creates a chain-of-custody problem that the FDA will identify during review.

GMP starting material requires a clinical Master Service Agreement (cMSA) between the sponsor and supplier. Under the cMSA, the supplier commits to specific manufacturing controls, documentation practices, and quality system requirements. The COA for GMP material carries more documentation than RUO: raw material lot numbers, equipment IDs, in-process testing results, personnel records, deviation logs (if any), and a QA release signature.

Here is what the documentation difference looks like in practice:

Parameter RUO Material GMP Material
Material grade Research grade GMP grade (e.g., GMP-grade separation reagents, beads)
Contracting Standard purchase order Clinical MSA (cMSA) required
Sterility testing Not required Required; results documented in COA
Infectious disease testing Minimal or basic screen Full FDA-required panel, licensed assays
HLA typing Optional Documented; required for matched programs
Batch record Minimal or absent Full batch record with deviations documented
QA release Not required Required; Medical Director and QA sign-off
CAPA system Not required Required for any non-conformance
Facility requirements Basic lab ISO 7 cleanroom; environmental monitoring
Computer system validation Not required 21 CFR Part 11 compliant systems required

OrganaBio processes GMP cell therapy starting material in ISO 7 cleanrooms at its Miami facility, with IQ/OQ/PQ equipment qualification, process validation, cleaning validation, and a 21 CFR Part 11 compliant quality management system. Every GMP lot goes through QA release before shipping.

One important boundary: disease-state donor material (collected from donors with autoimmune conditions, for example) is RUO only at OrganaBio. It is appropriate for disease modeling, biomarker discovery, and drug screening research, but not for use as GMP manufacturing starting material for patient infusion products. Autologous CAR-T programs requiring starting material from the actual patient use the patient’s own apheresis product, collected through clinical sites under separate arrangements.

Fresh vs. Cryopreserved Leukopaks: Trade-Offs for CAR-T Manufacturing

The choice between fresh and cryopreserved leukopaks has real consequences for your manufacturing schedule, your logistics complexity, and the phenotype of the T cells you receive.

Fresh leukopaks deliver cells with no freeze-thaw cycle, which preserves T cell phenotype most completely and avoids any viability losses associated with cryopreservation and thaw. For programs running tight manufacturing timelines or where T cell activation status at Day 0 is a critical variable, fresh material is often the better option. The constraint is logistics: fresh material has a short window from collection to processing, and your manufacturing site needs to be ready to receive and begin processing on the day of collection. You are also dependent on donor availability aligning with your manufacturing schedule.

Cryopreserved leukopaks eliminate the scheduling dependency. You can receive inventory, store it in your vapor-phase liquid nitrogen system, and begin manufacturing when your process is ready. For programs with unpredictable or flexible timelines, for clinical sites running across multiple manufacturing campaigns, or for programs that want to test multiple manufacturing conditions against the same donor lot, cryopreserved material offers real operational flexibility. The trade-off is that cryopreservation and thaw introduce additional variability, and some programs observe shifts in subset distribution or activation status post-thaw.

PBMC isolation from leukopaks, whether fresh or cryopreserved, yields approximately 85% of the starting PBMC content when performed correctly. OrganaBio uses negative isolation as its default PBMC isolation method, meaning isolation beads bind to non-target cells and are removed, leaving your target T cells, B cells, or NK cells untouched. Positive selection methods, by contrast, bind beads directly to the target cell surface, which can trigger activation signals you do not want going into a CAR-T manufacturing run. Negative selection preserves a non-activated, non-exhausted phenotype, which is the state you want at Day 0.

Isolated subsets (CD3+ T cells, CD4+, CD8+, NK cells, B cells, monocytes) are available as off-the-shelf inventory or as custom orders depending on your program requirements. Purity specifications for isolated T, B, and NK cells are at or above 90%, with post-isolation viability at or above 95%.

Supplier Evaluation Framework: What to Ask Before You Commit

Selecting a leukopak supplier for an IND program is a vendor qualification decision, not a purchase decision. Here is the framework for evaluating whether a supplier can support your program through manufacturing development, IND submission, and into Phase 1.

Processing speed and vertical integration. Ask specifically: does the supplier process leukopaks at their own facility, or do they rely on third-party collection centers for processing? Suppliers who control both the apheresis collection and the processing in the same facility control the chain of custody more completely and can guarantee shorter times from collection to processing. This matters for T cell phenotype on arrival.

COA structure. Review a sample COA before committing. A GMP-appropriate COA for a leukopak or isolated cell product should include: collection date and time, processing timestamps, cell count and viability, granulocyte and hematocrit percentages, infectious disease testing results with assay names, and the QA release signature. If the COA is missing timestamps, does not include infectious disease results, or lacks a QA sign-off, that is a documentation gap that will surface during your IND review.

Chain of custody documentation. Your supplier should be able to provide a continuous, timestamped chain of custody from donor consent through final product shipment. Gaps in that chain are regulatory exposure. Ask for a chain-of-custody document example from a previous lot.

Donor characterization included vs. purchased separately. Some suppliers provide a basic cell count COA and sell immunophenotyping, HLA typing, and infectious disease testing as add-on services, which adds cost and turnaround time. OrganaBio includes donor HLA typing, infectious disease testing, and immunophenotyping characterization with product, so you receive a fully characterized lot without assembling separate orders.

Recall capability. Ask directly: if we need to recall a specific donor for a second collection six months from now, can you do that? The answer tells you whether they maintain a registered, consent-compliant donor registry or whether they run on one-time appointments. For IND studies and long-term clinical programs, donor recallability is essential.

Facility accreditation. OrganaBio holds AABB accreditation, which establishes standards for blood banking, transfusion medicine, and cellular therapy product collection and processing. AABB accreditation is evidence of an independently audited quality system, not just a self-assessment.

Isolate method: negative vs. positive selection. This is a technical question worth asking any supplier offering isolated subsets. Negative isolation leaves target cells untouched by beads; positive selection attaches beads to the target cell surface. For CAR-T starting material, non-activated, non-bead-touched T cells are the goal.

Supply Chain Risk: Single-Site vs. Multi-Site Suppliers

A leukopak supplier with a single collection and processing location creates a single point of failure for your manufacturing program. Adverse weather events, facility maintenance, staff shortages, or a regulatory hold on that one site can interrupt your supply exactly when you need it for a scheduled manufacturing campaign.

Multi-site suppliers distribute that risk. If one location has a temporary interruption, a second location with the same GMP controls and donor registry can fulfill the order without changing your product specifications or your regulatory documentation. For Phase 1 programs that depend on consistent starting material, supply chain redundancy is a program protection measure, not a procurement luxury.

OrganaBio operates as a bi-coastal CTDMO, with facilities in Miami and San Diego. Both locations maintain the same quality system, the same donor qualification protocols, and the same GMP processing controls. For sponsors running programs that require geographic distribution, or that need supply continuity through any single-site disruption, the dual-coast structure provides real operational insurance.

The definition matters here. OrganaBio is a CTDMO: Contract Testing, Development, and Manufacturing Organization. The “T” for Testing is intentional and reflects the integrated QC, assay development, sterility testing, HLA typing, and infectious disease testing services that run alongside manufacturing. This is different from a CDMO that manufactures but outsources testing, or a CRO that tests but does not manufacture. The integrated model means that testing and manufacturing happen under the same quality system and the same roof, which simplifies your vendor management and your regulatory documentation.

Leukopak Supplier Comparison: Key Specifications to Require

Specification Minimum to Require OrganaBio Spec
Granulocyte content in leukopak <5% <3%
Hematocrit in leukopak <5% <3%
PBMC yield from leukopak >75% 85%+
T/B/NK cell purity (isolated subsets) >85% >90%
Post-isolation viability (isolated subsets) >90% >95%
Isolation method for subsets Negative or positive (specify) Negative isolation (default)
Sterility testing included (GMP) Required Yes
Infectious disease testing panel FDA-required panel, licensed assays Yes
HLA typing included Preferred for IND programs Yes, 6-gene high-resolution + KIR
QA release signature on COA Required for GMP Yes
Donor recallability Required for IND studies Yes, registered donor pool
AABB accreditation Strongly preferred Yes
Facility cleanroom class ISO 7 minimum ISO 7
Multi-site supply capability Preferred for Phase 1+ Yes (Miami + San Diego)
Fresh leukopak availability Preferred for tight manufacturing windows Yes, processed at OB facility
Cryopreserved leukopak availability Required for flexible scheduling Yes
Quarter-split leukopak option Useful for multi-campaign programs Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a leukopak and PBMCs for CAR-T manufacturing?

A leukopak is the raw apheresis product: a concentrate of white blood cells including T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and some granulocytes, collected directly from the donor. PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) are a processed fraction of the leukopak, obtained after density gradient centrifugation to remove granulocytes and red blood cells. For CAR-T manufacturing, many programs receive a leukopak and perform their own downstream processing, while others prefer to receive pre-isolated PBMCs or specific T cell subsets depending on their process design and the capabilities of their manufacturing facility.

When does my program need GMP-grade starting material vs. RUO?

Any time you are manufacturing a cell therapy product that will be administered to a human patient, you need GMP-grade starting material. This applies from the first-in-human Phase 1 dose through all subsequent phases. RUO material is appropriate for preclinical work, assay development, feasibility studies, and process development where the cells will not be used in a patient. Using RUO starting material in manufacturing for clinical use creates a regulatory documentation problem that will be identified during FDA review of your IND application.

How do I evaluate the processing speed of a leukopak supplier?

Ask for data, not a description. A credible supplier can provide summary data showing average time from blood receipt to first processing step across a representative sample of collections. You are looking for a supplier who consistently falls well within any processing window your sponsor or CMO requires. Some manufacturing programs define a specific window (for example, processing must begin within 6 to 8 hours of blood draw) to protect T cell phenotype. Your supplier’s processing time from receipt to first spin should have a meaningful buffer inside that window, not a median that scrapes the limit.

What does negative isolation mean and why does it matter for CAR-T?

Negative isolation means the separation process uses magnetic beads that bind to cells you want to remove, such as monocytes and B cells, rather than to the T cells you want to keep. After the beads are pulled away by a magnet, your target T cells are in the untouched fraction. Positive selection binds beads directly to the surface of T cells (typically via CD3 or CD4/CD8 markers), which can trigger TCR signaling and begin activating the cells before your manufacturing process even starts. For CAR-T programs aiming to transduce and expand naïve or memory T cells, receiving pre-activated cells at Day 0 compresses your manufacturing window and can accelerate exhaustion. Negative isolation preserves the resting state you want.

What documentation should I require from my leukopak supplier for IND filing?

Your IND filing will require documentation of your starting material source and quality. From your supplier, you need the executed clinical MSA (cMSA), the product-specific quality agreement, a certificate of analysis for each lot with all GMP-required fields (timestamps, QA release, testing results), batch records with deviation logs, supplier qualification documentation confirming their GMP status and facility accreditation, and evidence of their donor consent and infectious disease testing program. Many sponsors request a pre-IND supplier audit as part of vendor qualification. Your supplier should be able to support a site visit and provide documentation packages on request.

Can I use the same donor multiple times across my manufacturing program?

Yes, if your supplier maintains a registered donor pool with recall capability. Donor recallability means the supplier can contact a specific donor identified by a unique registry ID and schedule them for a second or third apheresis collection. This is valuable for programs that want to compare manufacturing lots from the same donor across different batches, for programs that need a known-healthy donor for each new manufacturing campaign, and for IND studies where the FDA may require traceability back to the original donor if a safety signal emerges. Not all leukopak suppliers operate a registry-based model. Some run on one-time donor appointments with no recall capability.

What is AABB accreditation and why does it matter for cell therapy starting material?

AABB (formerly the American Association of Blood Banks) is an international, not-for-profit accreditation organization that develops standards for blood banking, transfusion medicine, and cellular therapy product collection and processing. AABB accreditation means the facility has been audited against those standards by an independent assessor, not just self-assessed. For leukopak suppliers supporting cell therapy programs, AABB accreditation provides evidence that the donor screening, collection, processing, and storage practices meet an established, audited quality standard. Some sponsors require AABB accreditation as a condition of vendor qualification.

What is the difference between a CTDMO and a CDMO for cell therapy starting material?

A CDMO is a Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization, a supplier that handles manufacturing and development services. A CTDMO adds integrated testing services under the same roof and the same quality system. For cell therapy starting material specifically, this means HLA typing, sterility testing, infectious disease testing, QC assay development, and immunophenotyping are part of the same organization as the manufacturing and processing operations. The practical difference for your program: a CTDMO can issue a single COA with integrated testing results rather than requiring you to coordinate separate orders from a manufacturer and a contract testing lab. OrganaBio operates as a CTDMO, providing donor screening, leukapheresis, PBMC isolation, GMP processing, and testing services under one quality system across its Miami and San Diego facilities.

Ready to Evaluate Your Starting Material Supply Chain

The decisions you make about your leukopak supplier now determine what is possible in your CAR-T manufacturing program months from now. Donor characterization, processing speed, isolation method, GMP documentation, and supply chain redundancy are not procurement details. They are manufacturing variables with direct consequences for your IND timeline and your Phase 1 product quality.

OrganaBio supplies GMP leukopaks and isolated cell products (PBMCs, T cells, NK cells, B cells) from its bi-coastal CTDMO network in Miami and San Diego. Donors are registered and recallable, HLA typing and infectious disease testing ship with the product, and PBMC isolation uses negative selection as the default. Fresh collections are processed at OrganaBio’s own facility, with no third-party collection centers in the processing chain. GMP manufacturing runs in ISO 7 cleanrooms under a 21 CFR Part 11 compliant quality system, with AABB accreditation covering the collection and processing operations.

To discuss your program’s starting material requirements, request a sample COA, or begin supplier qualification, contact OrganaBio at organabio.com.

Source from OrganaBio

FDA-registered. ISO 7 cGMP. Ships anywhere in the US.

View LeukoPAK-FRSHTalk to Our Team

Andrew Larson

Managing Director, CPC Services

Andrew joins OrganaBio as a project manager with varied experience in project management, client relations, and process improvement.

Prior to OrganaBio, Andrew was a client relations manager for the cGMP nucleic acids business unit at Aldevron, coordinating and managing contracts at each stage of the contract lifecycle in support of cell and gene therapy program development. Andrew supported small- and large-scale biotechnology and pharmaceutical clients anywhere from pre-IND work through commercial supply chain establishment. Before Aldevron, Andrew was a project manager for the commercialization and business development department for Sanford Health, a worldwide hospital institution. At Sanford Health, Andrew helped manage medical device patent and prototype development efforts for employee innovations primarily in the cardiovascular, neurovascular, and software spaces. Andrew was also an engineer for Atirix Medical Systems and supported the buildout of automated analysis worksheets to streamline radiology department quality control procedures.

Andrew received his Bachelor of Science in Physics from Minnesota State University Moorhead and his Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. At the University of Minnesota, Andrew was part of the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, assisting efforts to automate MRI dataset registration and workflow improvement.

Michael Dee

Associate Director, QC and Analytical Development

Michael Dee has spent the last 17 years researching the immune system. Initially studying the recombinant cytokine IL-2 and its role in T cell subset differentiation and function at the University of Miami. He also helped elucidate the lower level of TCR diversity of T regs required to prevent autoimmunity in mice. Michael also supported construction, cloning, production, purification, and testing both in vitro and in vivo a novel IL-2/IL2Rα complex currently under clinical development with BMS. Michael also was a member of the department of immunology’s program project delineating the effect of a novel Eg7GP96 heat shock protein vaccine on tumor immunity.

While at Immunity Bio (formerly Altor Biosciences), he helped to characterize over 20 novel drugs for immune modulation and treatment of cancer.  After Immunity Bio, Michael was a founding team member of HCW Biologics, where he continued his role in design and initial production and characterization of several novel biologics. He has experience with proof of principle experiments with the generation CAR-NK and CAR T cells. His research at HCW was highlighted by his discovery of a process using novel biologics to activate and expand CIML NK cells. The process and rights were sold to Wugen and is currently in Phase I clinical trials. He also is listed as an Inventor on patent number: US20210268022A1 on method of activating regulatory T cells.

Meram Alamoudi

Senior Cell Processing Specialist

Meram received her master’s degree in biomedical sciences from Barry University and bachelor’s in Biology from Palm Beach Atlantic University.

Before her position at OrganaBio, Meram conducted research at Larkin University where she worked on assessing the impact of Hurricane Maria on respiratory diseases in Puerto Rico, which provided her with insight into research investigation and analysis along with generation of grant documentation.

Valeria Beckhoff-Ferrero

Senior Bioprocess Scientist

Valeria Beckhoff Ferrero has over 8 years of experience in the fields of stem cell research and tissue engineering. Valeria received her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering, specializing in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, from Drexel University in Philadelphia. Valeria has expertise in problem solving and finding manufacturing solutions for isolating various types stem cells and other cell derived products from different tissues.

Before joining OrganaBio, Valeria was a lead manufacturing engineer at the Amnion Foundation. She aided in instituting a GMP infrastructure, including documentation, to manufacture clinical grade placental derived stem cells. In her role, she worked in perfecting isolation, culture, selection and cell maintenance processes for perinatal derived stem cells.

Valeria’s experience includes working as an Automation Engineer at the New York Stem Cell Foundation, where she aided in the creation and coding procedures for liquid handlers to manufacture induced pluripotent stem cells. At NYSF, Valeria researched new methods of sorting, reprogramming and differentiating iPSCs.

During her studies, Valeria worked at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital’s Radiation Oncology department, where she engineered various devices to aid in hyperthermia treatments. Additionally, Valeria co-authored multiple publications on magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound and radiation antennas for hyperthermia treatments.

Marisa Reinoso

Director, Regional Scientific Sales

Marisa has experience leading marketing and sales life sciences programs for over a decade. Originally a lab researcher, she made the jump to marketing & sales in life sciences and never looked back.

At OrganaBio, she connects cell therapy developers on the West coast and in Asia with the healthy donor starting materials they need to develop their therapies. Prior to OrganaBio, she was the cell therapy marketing lead at Invetech, heading the launch of the company’s first cell therapy product. Marisa has led marketing programs at clinical supply companies Sherpa Clinical Packaging and PCI Pharma Services. In her spare time, Marisa enjoys traveling, eating, and pretending she’s a tennis player. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Reed College and an MBA from Portland State University.

Thelma Cela

Senior Director, Tissue Procurement

Thelma Cela is a top performing professional with over 25 years’ experience in management, leadership, business development and marketing fields with business acumen and skills in driving revenue and profit growth in multiple corporate cultures. Prior to joining OrganaBio, Thelma served as Senior Director for Health and Human Services for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Her role had oversight for health clinics, health plan administration, the behavioral health department, and elder services. In this governmental administrative capacity, Thelma had primarily responsibility for the HHS’ divisions’ budget, capital projects, utilization management, efficiency, and efficacy.

Thelma’s prior work experiences include Vice President of Clinical Operations for OrthoNOW. In this role, she provided guidance on all clinical matters, set direction on clinical policies and procedures and monitoring healthcare policy changes. As the national Vice President of Clinical Operations, Thelma also designed, developed, and implemented guidelines and protocols and ensured compliance regarding overall patient experience.

Before joining OrthoNOW, Thelma had been recruited by Leon Medical Centers, a private healthcare company operating comprehensive medical centers to launch a new business line addressing the health and wellness of an aging population. As Director, Thelma researched, created, and launched the company’s Health Living Centers which provided first of its kind facilities in the South Florida market to offer services to the community of health aging.

Thelma has a proven track record in multiple corporate healthcare cultures having worked for Mercy Hospital where she was Senior Program Director of their Diabetes Treatment Center and Director of their Surgical Weight Loss Program. She enhanced these service lines awareness in the community, improved both lines’ clinical outcomes, and built volume growth while maintaining ongoing physician support. She served in a similar capacity for American Healthways.

Thelma earned her MBA from Miami Regional University where she graduated Cum Laude and her undergraduate degree in Psychology is from the University of Miami.

She serves on the advisory panel for Florida International University’s Women in Business Leadership Program helping future women become future business leaders through thought leadership, barrier destruction, and the power of influence.

Dominic Mancini

Vice President, Operations

Dominic Mancini brings 12 years of experience working the interfaces between Analytical Development, Process Development, Quality, and Manufacturing Science to OrganaBio. A lifelong learner, Dominic enjoys solving the many scientific and operational challenges presented in the field of cell and gene therapy.

Prior to OrganaBio, Dominic spent 8 years at Bluebird Bio as the company grew from 45 to 1200+ employees and from 1 clinical asset to a robust commercial pipeline. At Bluebird, Dominic initially supported the development and technology transfer of lentiviral vector manufacturing processes. As demand grew for lentiviral process and product characterization, Dominic led the development, qualification, transfer, and validation two commercial release methods. Dominic transitioned back to the Process Development organization to lead the vector manufacturing core team, increasing operational efficiency through a 5S implementation, process schedule intensification, and reverse technology transfer initiative. More recently, Dominic supported the build-out of bluebird’s Manufacturing Science & Technology team followed by the Data Systems & Analytics team, handling late-stage commercial asset support.

Dominic received his Bachelor of Chemical Engineering with Distinction from the University of Delaware. Dominic’s undergraduate research culminated in his thesis on heterologous expression of G-protein coupled receptors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After graduation, Dominic was the premier hire of the Zhou Laboratory at Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, MA. In three years, Dominic established an animal model of COPD and co-authored several papers with his collaborators in the Pulmonary division.

Christopher B. Goodman

Vice President, Quality & Regulatory Affairs

Christopher B. Goodman is a biopharmaceutical consultant and executive making a global impact in the cellular therapy technology arena. The scope of Christopher’s expertise encompasses Cellular Therapeutic Operations, Quality and Regulatory Affairs, Global Corporate Operations, Scientific Strategic Planning, Scientific R&D Collaborations, and Marketing & Commercialization.

Christopher recently joined OrganaBio as their Vice President of Regulatory Affairs. In this role, Christopher will be helping the company, its clients and partners navigate the complexities of the domestic and international regulatory requirements governing advanced cellular therapy products and manufacturing.

Previously, Christopher held positions with the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB), Virgin Health Bank, Ventana Medical Systems, and Celgene.

While with AABB, he held the positions of Senior Director of New Products and Lead Quality Assessor, auditing both domestic and international organizations to known standards in an effort to promote and ensure patient quality care and manufactured product consistency and standardization within Cellular Therapy, Blood Banking, Transfusion Services, Perioperative and Donor Center industries and operations. He contributed greatly to the work of AABB’s accreditation program providing his deep breadth of knowledge and technical acumen on many committees during his tenure. His pioneering work in the realm of virtual assessments during the COVID pandemic allowed AABB to flex into the planning and execution of this novel approach to the maintenance of accreditation activities during a global travel crisis. His agile thinking and approach to planning provided as minimal disruption as possible to AABB’s customer facilities.

While working with Virgin Health Bank in the State of Qatar and the United Kingdom, Christopher advanced through a series of executive roles. He joined Virgin Health Bank as the Director of Operations, during which time he managed the successful design, and build out of a new state-of-the-art cGMP facility, the first in the Middle East. As Director and Chief Executive Officer, he directed the launch of the first Arab-centric stem cell bank, and strategically guided the organization to enhanced shareholder value and expansion across the Middle East and UK. In these roles, he also oversaw global corporate operations, research collaborations, product portfolio expansion, and regulatory framework.

Christopher managed the Detection and Chemistry Assay Development Group for Ventana Medical Systems, a global leader and innovator of tissue-based diagnostic solutions. In this role, he directed overall program goals, optimized resources, and guided technical and product direction in global regulated environments.

Prior to Ventana Medical Systems, he held the position of Director of Operations for the high-growth Cellular Therapeutics Division of Celgene. As a senior-level scientist and member of the executive team, he directed divisional operations, medical affairs and executed business and scientific strategic planning.

Danielle Smyla

Senior Director, Quality Assurance

Danielle Smyla, M.S., brings 14 years of Quality Assurance and GMP experience in the Biotechnology and Medical Device industries. Ms. Smyla is an established Quality Leader with expertise in the implementation, management and continuous improvement of Quality Management Systems for GMP operations.

Prior to joining OrganaBio, Danielle was a key member of the Quality Management team at Canon BioMedical, where she led the cross-functional development and implementation of their Quality Management System. She also managed a team of Quality Specialists and Sr. Specialists, coaching them in the implementation, management and identification of improvements to quality processes.

Ms. Smyla’s Quality-focused career is complimented by valuable hands-on experience in GMP product manufacturing, as well as R&D laboratory experimentation and formulation work in support of product development.

Danielle has earned a Master’s in Biotechnology from the Johns Hopkins University and a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from the George Washington University.

Sarah Alter, Ph.D.

Lab Director

Sarah Alter, Ph.D., is Laboratory Director at OrganaBio, LLC, where she provides technical leadership across laboratory operations, process development, product manufacturing, and clinical sample processing services supporting cell and gene therapy developers worldwide. She brings more than 20 years of immunology and translational research experience spanning autoimmunity, oncology, and infectious disease.

Since joining OrganaBio in 2018, Dr. Alter has progressed through roles of increasing responsibility, first as Director of Immunology, leading development and manufacturing of human-derived immune cell products for immuno-oncology partners and clients; then as Senior Director of Scientific Affairs, where she served as immunology subject matter expert and shaped scientific strategy across new product launches, market analyses, and client engagements. She also served as founding Managing Director of HemaCenter, LLC, OrganaBio’s FDA-registered leukapheresis collection subsidiary, where she stood up operations, recruited the medical team, and authored governing protocols and SOPs.

Earlier in her career, Dr. Alter led preclinical R&D for IL-15–based immunotherapies at Altor BioScience (now ImmunityBio), contributing to programs that advanced into the clinic and co-authoring numerous peer-reviewed publications. She holds a Ph.D. in Immunology from the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and an M.Sc. in Microbiology from Florida Atlantic University, and is a registered Patent Agent licensed to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Carlos Carballosa, Ph.D

Vice President, Sales

Dr. Carlos Carballosa holds a doctorate in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Miami and currently leads global sales for OrganaBio as the VP of Sales. Since joining the company in 2018, Carlos has had a hand in managing all of OrganaBio’s products and services including perinatal tissue, apheresis material, and cell processing and cryopreservation support services for clinical trials.

Oscar Robles

Director, Quality Systems

Oscar Robles has over thirty years of experience in pharmaceutical and medical device industries. His main areas of expertise are in Quality Systems, Quality Assurance, Manufacturing Systems Validation, Computerized Systems Validation, implementation of GxP Computerized Systems and ERP Systems such as TrackWise, Electronic Document Management, JDEwards, SAP, and Oracle. Prior to joining OrganaBio, Oscar was a member of the Quality Management team at Apotex – Aveva Drug Delivery Systems for ten years. Oscar has earned a Master’s in Business Administration from Nova Southeastern University and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Florida International University.

Request Free Sample Free Sample